![]() The issue is also discussed in a related topic in StackOverflow. So, question: is there any programmatic alternative to this, for the particular use case (i.e., several small HashMap objects)? If I use the HashMap clear() method, for instance, the problem goes away, but so do the data stored in the HashMap! :-) The first approach works fine, the second ends up in another, this time about the heap.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |